The most vibrant young political
movement to hit Seattle in years, the one that pushed the $15/hour minimum wage
to the top of the agenda in Seattle and cities around the country, is making a
bid in the local politics of global warming.
Jess Spear, a climate scientist
active in the 2013 campaign that elected Kshama Sawant to Seattle City Council is
a 2014 election candidate for Washington
House Speaker Frank Chopp’s 43rd Legislative District seat. Like Sawant she is running on the Socialist
Alternative ticket.
Socialist. Now there’s a word that raises red
flags. But maybe not so alarming in a
city that just elected its first socialist city councilmember in a century.
Personally I’m not so hung up on labels but instead judge candidates on the
quality of their ideas. I sat down to
talk with Jess lately, and took away three key ideas that ground her campaign.
First, the climate crisis demands
urgent action. We need a crash program to convert to 100 percent clean,
renewable energy, starting in Washington state.
Market-based solutions such as carbon cap and trade or carbon taxes
simply will not work fast enough to accomplish the mission. It will require active public policy and
major public investment.
Second, ordinary people pressed by
increasingly stressful economic conditions will not have time or energy to
focus on climate and environment unless their own personal environments are
secured. That means good jobs and
affordable housing. Climate must be
embedded in a broader effort to meet people’s needs. For example by creating large numbers of
green jobs to work on wind turbines, solar panels, smart grids, energy
efficiency and mass transit.
Third, these victories can only be
achieved by mobilizing people who are angry with politicians and turned off by
politics as usual. Especially young people.
The way to bring people into politics is by offering real solutions to real
life problems, such as Seattle’s exploding rents. One of Spear’s top campaign planks is a bill
that would allow local governments to impose rent control, forbidden by state
law now.
We’ll dig in to Spear’s positions in
a bit. First, a little about Jess. The
32-year-old Virginia native took a graduate degree in marine science from
University of South Florida in 2008. She
studied tiny ocean fossils of past eras for vital clues about how climate
changes. Such studies help forecast
future climate.
Jess was deeply concerned about
global warming and hoped to contribute to solutions with her science. In 2011
she moved to Seattle. Her oceanographer husband came to work with the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. She worked as a
micropaleontologist at the Burke Museum under a U.S. Geological Service
contract until she became another cut under the federal budget sequester.
Jess was not feeling hopeful about
climate or politics. But later that year
events stirred her optimism. Arab Spring, labor occupation of the Wisconsin Statehouse,
and then the Occupy movement.
“I saw young people stepping in at
that point to take on war, debt, all the problems young people are told are
normal.”
She visited the downtown Seattle
Occupy camp and began talking with the Socialist Alternative folks about
economic democracy. It made sense. She
has been working as an activist in the group since. Jess was volunteer coordinator of the Sawant
Council campaign and continues as the organizing director of 15 Now. The $15 minimum wage is now law in Seattle,
close to passage in San Francisco, seriously on the table in New York and
Chicago and has chapters in 17 cities around the country.
That is a stunning example of
grassroots democracy at work, a radiant beam of hope in a political system tied
up in special interest money and interminable gridlock. Sawant clearly dominated the 2013 city
election debate. The mayoral candidates
were stumbling over each other trying to demonstrate who was more for
$15/hour.
Could this election change the dialogue
on climate and clean energy in the same way?
Could Jess be the point of the spear to move the climate debate beyond
market-based solutions into proactive public policies that scale to the immense
global warming challenge?
Much depends on how successfully she
runs in the 43rd. The
district spans some of Seattle’s most progressive neighborhoods including
Wallingford, University District, Capitol Hill, Eastlake, Montlake and pieces
of Greenlake, Fremont and downtown. If
there’s anyplace a socialist candidate can do well it’s here. Sawant took 29 percent in her 2012 run against Chopp, a record for any of his election opponents. She won a majority of the area in her Council bid.
Spear plans a campaign heavy on
doorbelling, aiming at 1,000 volunteers.
The campaign also has a goal of raising $150,000 in individual
donations. Chopp wants to raise $300,000, substantially more than the $40,000
he spent in 2012, an indication he takes the Spear challenge seriously.
Now let’s delve into the ideas.
“In my campaign environmental
activists will see a voice for addressing climate change from the standpoint that
bold change is necessary,” Jess, says. “I am disappointed with Jay Inslee for
setting up another task force to design a set of market-based solutions. Do we need another task force? Carbon cap and
trade and carbon taxes aren’t good enough and they won’t work fast enough. We have to be honest and say that is not going
to work. We have to look at the energy
needed to pass these measures. Instead
consider focusing that energy on funding renewable energy infrastructure,
creating thousands of jobs and putting us on a pathway to a sustainable future.”
So what should the governor do?
“I would immediately call for 100
percent renewable energy and for a way to invest in it. I would get out there and build support for
it. Get communities involved. Build the kind of grassroots movement that is
necessary. I would do exactly what I am
doing with my campaign. I would put forward a bold vision of what society
should look like. If he did that he would really rally people behind him.”
Notes Spear, “The environmental
movement has failed to connect with working people and the need for jobs. We need to connect the labor movement and the
environmental movement.”
“This is a very weak recovery,” she
says. “There is so much work that needs
to be done, especially with renewable energy.
We can create jobs with 100 percent renewable energy.”
The 100 percent concept is feasible.
A team led by Stanford scientist Mark Jacobsen earlier this year released a 100
percent renewables plan for Washington state. It is part of a 50-state effort on which I
will soon blog.
So where is the money in a tight
state budget?
“There are 500 corporate loopholes
that starve the state treasury of $6 billion each year. Close corporate loopholes. That creates
plenty of money to invest in transit and renewable energy . . . We need massive
expansion in transit and renewable energy.
We need to connect expansion and funding with corporate handouts. It’s one or the other.”
“We would not call for working people
to pay for this. That is a mistake of the environmental community. All taxes working people have to pay pit them
against the policy and the environment. We have to refocus the attention on
corporations. Focusing on consumers
really pits people against each other.”
Carbon cap and trade (CCAT) and
carbon tax proposals generally include a rebate of carbon revenues to avoid
impacts on low-and middle-income people.
A substantial majority of the population could receive checks that
exceed increased energy costs. That
actually represents a redistribution of income.
Jess has some concerns though.
“People are struggling to meet
bills. They can’t wait to the end of year
for a check.”
Another problem is public skepticism
that the money will actually come to them.
“They don’t trust the Democratic
Party not to impose taxes on them,” Jess says. “When they had a supermajority
in 2007 they passed regressive taxes.
It’s not surprising that working people don’t trust government. The Democrats point to the Republicans and
say we’re keeping them out. That’s not true. The policies they pass drive
people to the Republican party.”
Instead Jess suggests not allowing electric
utilities to pass added carbon costs on to customers. In my view, that is an interesting concept
that would have two effects. First, if
additional fuel costs ate directly into utility bottom lines it would
supercharge a rapid move to renewables. But leaving customers unaffected would
also eliminate the incentive for investments in energy efficiency. This is one of the prime benefits of pricing
carbon. There is another option. When carbon is priced it creates a new pool
of public money that could be directed to grants and low-cost loans for
efficiency projects.
So if Jess is elected and a cap and
trade bill comes up for a vote, what will she do?
“We would look at it very closely. If
it’s a step forward, an inch or two toward where we need to go, we would vote
for that. But, we would work to really
make sure it had sharp teeth.”
Jess's climate agenda - eliminating corporate loopholes to invest in 100 percent renewable energy - is indeed bold. People who grapple with the convoluted
politics of Olympia might question the practicality. One of the state environmental community’s
2014 priorities was closing a $59 million oil industry tax loophole to invest
in education. Big oil pushed that one
back.
Jess’s answer to “political
practicality” arguments is that it is the political system itself that is
failing – Stirring a bottom-up grassroots movement is the imperative. It’s about bringing in “people that don’t look
to political system for change,” Jess says, people who now feel that, “Politics
is not for me. None of these
representatives really fight for the issues that affect me. This campaign is about reaching out to them
and providing a voice for them.”
That is a key reason the Spear
campaign is focusing on Seattle’s stratospheric rise in rents, highest in the
country. At Saturday’s Fremont Solstice
Parade poles all along the route were decorated with Spear posters declaring,
“Rents are too damned high. We need rent
control now.” Allowing cities to pass
rent control ordinances is one of those basic, practical measures that appeal
to people’s real concerns, much like $15/hour.
“People are upset at corporate
politicians who ignore everyday issues.
As a socialist those come first for me. I am a climate scientist and
environmental activist. But it was after
years of activism and not seeing us get anywhere that I came to understand it’s
about mass movements. People demanding change.
We are focused on people’s deep anger at the political system.”
Jess calls out the recent election
takedown of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor as evidence that anger toward politics as usual prevails across the spectrum.
She hopes to tap into that sentiment in her race against Chopp.
“Frank Chopp personifies everything
that is wrong in the state legislature,” Jess says. “As speaker of house he is
far to the right of his district.” She
calls out “criminally underfunded education,” social services cuts, corporate
welfare and “the most regressive taxation in the country.” “If you’re happy
with the status quo, then vote for Frank Chopp.”
Chopp certainly does not represent
his district on climate, one of the hotbeds of climate action in Washington
state. I can personally testify to that.
In 2008 I worked for one of the groups leading the charge for that
year’s state climate bill. Everyone
wanted to pass a meaningful carbon cap.
But the speaker was in the way.
I recall conversations around the
office conference table in which the politics were discussed. Chopp was most concerned with maintaining a
large House Democratic majority, and thus did not want to offend suburban and
rural representatives and districts. He
was coddling the conservative Democrats.
So the 2008 climate bill enacted a carbon reduction goal without legal
teeth to it, which is why we are back to the issue now.
“We are not going to get anywhere on
environmental policy and the economic crisis with politicians straddling both
sides,” Jess says.
When Richard Nixon created the
Environmental Protection Administration seven months after the first Earth Day it was not because he was an
environmentalist, Jess notes. It was because millions of people were in the
streets demanding change.
“We need to apply that lesson to
today. The reason for the focus on market-based solutions and lobbying is
because a lot of people have forgotten that lesson about how radical change
happens. Environmental groups focus too
much on what is politically possible, which is inherently tied to what
corporations are willing to accept.”
Jess Spear reflects a new generation
that is not buying the deal. She is looking to young folks to drive change.
“When it comes to young people the
problem feels so incredibly big. Where
do you start? In history classes
they are taught it’s all about one great person like MLK, not the millions who
caused the change. They don’t know that
history is made by everyday people like themselves. When they do learn that, people get excited
about what is possible.”
The election of Kshama Sawant to
Seattle City Council demonstrates possibility. People will look beyond labels to vote
for a candidate whose ideas make sense.
Lots of non-socialists voted for Sawant, and Spear’s ideas are
compelling across a broad spectrum.
Global warming and climate impacts
are intensifying across the world. It is
clear we need a point of the spear movement to thrust the climate debate to a
new level of urgency. We need a movement
which forwards climate solutions that scale to the immensity of the global warming threat. In her call for a crash program to bring on
100 percent renewable energy and a massive grassroots upsurge to make it happen,
Jess Spear has hit the mark.
No comments:
Post a Comment